The men who shaped Kenya's Capital Markets Part 2: How Chris Kirubi Built and Liquidated the greatest cash cow:
From fragmented regional silos to a KES 19.5 Billion Coca-Cola exit—the boardroom battles, antitrust wars, and capital allocation.
The Coca-Cola Consolidation: How Chris Kirubi’s Centum Built Almasi Beverages
Before Centum executed its historic multi-billion-shilling exits, the late billionaire industrialist Chris Kirubi—the corporate mastermind and largest individual shareholder of Centum Investment Company—recognized a massive operational inefficiency in Kenya’s beverage sector.
For decades, the local distribution of Coca-Cola products was highly fragmented, divided among regional, family-owned, or state-backed bottling franchises operating in economic silos. Kirubi’s vision was simple yet aggressive: consolidate the regional bottlers, build massive manufacturing scale, eliminate territorial friction, and manufacture an institutional cash cow.
However, executing this strategy was far from smooth sailing. It required a masterful blend of aggressive boardroom maneuvers, navigating high-stakes antitrust laws, and winning multi-billion-shilling tax wars in the highest courts of the land.
📅 The Chronological Timeline & Regulatory Battlegrounds
🔹 1970s – 2000s: The Silo Era
For over thirty years, Mount Kenya Bottlers (Nyeri), Rift Valley Bottlers (Eldoret), and Kisii Bottlers (Kisii) operate as completely independent corporate entities under localized territorial bottling agreements with The Coca-Cola Company. Each suffers from individual capacity constraints, localized supply chain bottlenecks, and high operational overheads.
🔹 August 2012: The Architecture of the Merger
Under Chris Kirubi’s strategic guidance and the execution team led by a young James Mworia, Centum initiates deep boardroom negotiations with the minority shareholders and local boards of the three independent franchises.
August 2, 2012: Kisii, Mount Kenya, and Rift Valley Bottlers formally announce a three-way reorganization of ownership to combine their shareholding and governance under a single unlisted public holding company: Almasi Beverages Limited.
🔹 January 2013: The Birth of Almasi & Minority Pushback
January 8, 2013: The statutory and regulatory green lights clear. The “merger of equals” is finalized, legally converting the independent operations into wholly owned subsidiaries of the new Almasi Beverages framework. Centum stakes its claim early, injecting capital to secure a prominent minority footprint in the unified group.
⚖️ The Legal Friction: Immediate boardroom pushback emerges from regional agricultural cooperatives and legacy family investors who had held stakes since the 1970s. They fiercely resist yielding their independent corporate identities, fearing that a centralized holding company controlled by a Nairobi-based private equity fund would dilute their local influence and dividend rights.
🔹 2014 – 2016: The Hostile Mop-Up & Aggressive Creep
This becomes the defining era of Kirubi’s playbook. Minority shareholders refuse to match capital calls required to upgrade antiquated bottling infrastructure and fund new automated, high-speed PET production lines.
Centum launches an aggressive buy-out campaign, systematically mopping up shares from fragmented minority investors across the country.
By step-funding capital expansions, Centum legally and mathematically dilutes the resisting peripheral owners.
The Result: Centum forces its way up the capital stack, crossing the threshold to secure a 53.9% absolute controlling stake in Almasi Beverages. Concurrently, they maintain a separate 27.6% strategic stake inside Nairobi Bottlers Limited.
🔹 2017 – 2018: Operational Synergies & The KRA Shadow
With absolute management control, Centum aggressively cuts corporate replication. They unify accounting, centralize raw material procurement (sugar, glass, and concentrate), and realize massive cost synergies. However, an existential tax battle threatens the asset’s entire valuation.
⚡ The KES 5 Billion Tax Bottleneck: The Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) attempts to slap the bottling entities with a staggering KES 5.6 Billion excise tax demand on returnable glass bottles and plastic crates, arguing that tax should be levied every time a container is returned and refilled. This legal battle drags heavily through the corporate tribunal and high courts.
🔹 June 2019: The Ultimate Liquidation & Antitrust Showdown
Having successfully institutionalized a fragmented localized operation into a streamlined national machine, Centum draws the attention of the global parent network.
June 2019: Coca-Cola Beverages Africa (CCBA) approaches Centum to buy out the entire consolidated asset. Centum signs an agreement to sell its 53.9% stake in Almasi and its 27.6% stake in Nairobi Bottlers to CCBA for a monumental KES 19.5 Billion in cash proceeds.
🏆 The Supreme Court Victory: In the exact same season the sale is being finalized (July 2019), the Court of Appeal strikes down the KRA’s excise tax demand, ruling that taxing returnable containers multiple times amounts to unlawful double taxation. The KRA appeals to the Supreme Court but ultimately loses on technicalities, permanently clearing the multi-billion tax liability off Almasi’s books and protecting Centum’s massive cash haul.
🛑 The Antitrust Compromise: The transaction triggers massive antitrust scrutiny from the Competition Authority of Kenya (CAK) and the COMESA Competition Commission over market foreclosure and potential job losses. To secure regulatory approval, the parties sign strict, legally binding public interest undertakings: CCBA is legally mandated to implement the “cooler space rule”, reserving at least 20% of display space in Coca-Cola-provided coolers for smaller, local non-alcoholic competitors.
The Strategic Omission: Why Kirubi Left Coast and Equator Bottlers Out of the Loop
When analyzing the massive KES 19.5 Billion liquidation of Centum’s beverage portfolio to Coca-Cola Beverages Africa (CCBA) in 2019, amateur corporate analysts often assume the strategy required absolute national domination from day one. They look at the final map of unified bottling operations in Kenya and imagine a single, sweeping boardroom conquest.
But elite private equity execution is defined as much by what you leave on the table as what you capture.
When Chris Kirubi and James Mworia sat down in 2012 to draw up the blueprint for what would become Almasi Beverages Limited, there were actually six independent franchise bottling operations covering the country. Nairobi Bottlers was the crown jewel serving the capital, while five regional plants split the rest of the map.
Yet, when the merger was finalized, two major regional players were conspicuously left out in the cold: Coast Bottlers (serving Mombasa and the coastal strip) and Equator Bottlers (serving Kisumu and the wider Western region).
Leaving them out wasn’t an oversight or a failure of negotiation. It was a masterclass in pragmatic restraint and capital allocation. Here is how ignoring the periphery saved the entire multi-billion-shilling playbook.
1. The Trap of “Boiling the Ocean”
In private equity and corporate structuring, the fastest way to kill a deal is trying to solve every problem at once—a trap known as “boiling the ocean.”
Equator Bottlers and Coast Bottlers were highly isolated, defensive corporate fiefdoms. Combined, they only controlled about 23% of the national Coca-Cola market share. However, their underlying corporate architecture was incredibly complex. They were owned by hyper-localized, fiercely protective private family networks and historical legacy shareholders who viewed Nairobi-based institutional funds with immense suspicion.
Had Centum attempted a grand, six-way national merger from the start, the transaction would have instantly bogged down. Decades-old family rivalries, localized valuation disputes, and endless boardroom drama in Mombasa and Kisumu would have dragged the negotiations on for years, bleeding capital and stalling momentum. Kirubi understood that speed is a transaction’s greatest ally.
2. Weaponizing Existing Leverage
Instead of picking fights in territories where they had no historical edge, Kirubi and Mworia mapped out the path of least resistance.
Centum, alongside the state-owned Industrial and Commercial Development Corporation (ICDC), already held powerful foundational minority stakes inside Mount Kenya Bottlers (Nyeri), Rift Valley Bottlers (Eldoret), and Kisii Bottlers (Kisii).
This shared institutional footprint gave Centum the structural and political muscle to force a consolidation. They didn’t need to pitch a radical new concept to complete strangers; they simply had to convince existing partners that merging their contiguous upcountry logistics would eliminate internal territorial friction and unlock massive manufacturing scale. By focusing 100% of their energy on this upcountry block, Centum went from a structural concept to a fully operational, unified holding company (Almasi Beverages) with blinding speed
3. Creating a Contiguous Monopoly first
Geography is destiny in the fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) sector. The upcountry territories shared deeply interconnected supply chains, overlapping distributor networks, and contiguous borders spanning the central and western highlands. Consolidating them immediately rationalized the cost of hauling glass, sugar, and water across the most densely populated economic corridors of Kenya.
Coast Bottlers, by contrast, operated in a completely decoupled geographic silo. Its demographic dynamics were highly seasonal—driven heavily by the coastal tourism cycle—and its supply chain dependencies were entirely different from upcountry operations. By leaving the coastal outlier out of the initial equation, Centum avoided massive logistical integration headaches and built a highly efficient, localized upcountry manufacturing monopoly.
4. The Valuation Anchor & The Ultimate Outsourced Cleanup
By building Almasi Beverages as a lean, aggressive upcountry juggernaut, Centum achieved something brilliant: they proved the consolidation thesis first. They used strict capital calls to systematically dilute resisting upcountry minorities, upgraded the plants to high-speed automated PET lines, and drove corporate valuations through the roof.
When Coca-Cola Beverages Africa (CCBA) approached the table in 2019 with a KES 19.5 Billion check, Centum didn’t need to own 100% of the map to demand a 100% institutional premium. They had packaged the massive, high-volume upcountry engine into a clean, de-risked corporate vehicle.
The ultimate punchline of this strategic restraint? Once CCBA bought out Centum’s consolidated block, the global parent company used its own massive balance sheet to mop up Equator Bottlers and Coast Bottlers later.
Chris Kirubi let the buyer do the heavy lifting of final, absolute national centralization after Centum had already walked away with a staggering 38.97% Internal Rate of Return (IRR) on Nairobi Bottlers. It stands as a timeless lesson for African entrepreneurs: Focus on where your leverage is absolute, prove the model, and let the market pay you for your restraint.
🧠 The Capital Allocation Retrospective
The Almasi consolidation remains the single largest exit by cash proceeds in Centum’s history. Against an original combined entry cost of approximately KES 3.4 to KES 3.5 Billion, Chris Kirubi’s playbook netted Centum an Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of 27.15% on Almasi and 38.97% on Nairobi Bottlers.
It stands as a flawless textbook demonstration of how an active investment holding company can brave minority disputes, absorb high-stakes regulatory adjustments, defeat aggressive tax authorities, and ultimately exit at an outsized institutional premium.
The Battle of the Titans: How Kirubi Dismantled the Moi-Era Bottling Fiefdoms
When Chris Kirubi set his sights on consolidating Kenya’s regional Coca-Cola bottling franchises into Almasi Beverages, he wasn’t just executing a standard corporate restructuring—he was going toe-to-toe with a formidable wall of powerful, old-guard Moi-era titans who fiercely guarded their independent manufacturing fiefdoms.
To gain absolute control, Kirubi and Centum had to strategically outmaneuver and buy out the entrenched interests of:
Simeon Nyachae & Dr. John P. Simba: The legendary, towering political kingpins who, along with the family-owned Sansora Group and key regional boardroom anchors like Dr. John P. Simba, held sway over the equity and leadership of Kisii Bottlers.
Matu Wamae: The long-serving former Mathira MP and central Kenya business pioneer who reigned for decades as the powerful Chairman of Mount Kenya Bottlers in Nyeri.
Paul K. Matelong: The North Rift business heavyweight who controlled the board as the long-standing Chairman of Rift Valley Bottlers in Eldoret, while simultaneously wielding massive national influence as the Chairman of the Federation of Kenya Employers (FKE) Rift Valley Branch.
It was a classic corporate clash of eras: Kirubi’s aggressive modern private equity roll-up strategy directly dismantling the independent manufacturing empires built by the most powerful political and economic power brokers of the Moi regime.
Correcting James Mworia’s KES 28 Billion Mistake: The Two Non-Negotiable Cash Demands Facing Centum CEO
Is TRIFIC I-REIT James Mworia’s Attempt to Correct a KES 28 Billion Capital Allocation Mistake?



Good read 👍🏽. Centum booked massive gains on exit but I still think they should have kept Almasi & Nairobi bottlers as long term, high dividend yielding assets. Beyond paying down some debts, I don't think they had a good idea on how to utilize the proceeds of the exit well.
They could always partially exit down the line via an NSE listing at a higher valuation. Their entry was perfect but exit was sub optimal.
Masterclass of the bigger picture it's interesting how it looks like coincidence until you look back on things 😂😂 its like The Battle of Thermopylae how Persians landed an attack during the greek Olympics initiative and execution it's a double punch considering im just from looking at polycarp Igathe