When the board of Centum Investment Company PLC released the notice for its 59th Annual General Meeting, item 4(e) under Special Business read like a familiar script: a proposal to authorize another open-market share buyback of up to 10% of the company’s issued equity—roughly 65.5 million shares—over the next 18 months. At current valuation levels on the Nairobi Securities Exchange (NSE), executing this mandate requires a potential capital deployment exceeding KES 1.18 billion. On paper, financial theory suggests that share repurchases signal management’s unyielding confidence in an undervalued stock, creatively boosting earnings per share (EPS) by reducing the total share count. But context is everything. When applied to Centum’s structural realities, this repeated maneuver raises uncomfortable questions about capital allocation priorities, debt management, and the creeping consolidation of corporate governance.
Is this proposed buyback a genuine attempt to return capital to equity holders, or is it a calculated effort to mop up floating retail stock, consolidate control, and quiet the vocal floor of retail investors?
The Flop of the 2023–2026 Buyback: To evaluate the proposed 2026 program, analysts must first examine the execution metrics of the previous attempt. Between February 2023 and March 2026, Centum executed a multi-phase buyback program targeting 65.6 million shares. When the window officially closed on March 31, 2026, the firm had repurchased a total of 10,839,300 shares—achieving a dismal 16.5% execution rate against its original target.
Centum Buyback Performance (2023–2026 Target vs. Actual)
┌───────────────────────────┬───────────────────────┐
│ Target Repurchase Volume │ 65,559,241 shares │
│ Actual Repurchased Volume │ 10,839,300 shares │
│ Overall Execution Rate │ 16.53% │
├───────────────────────────┼───────────────────────┤
│ Phase 1 (Feb 23 - Sep 24) │ 10,688,500 shares │
│ Phase 2 (Oct 24 - Mar 26) │ 150,800 shares │
└───────────────────────────┴───────────────────────┘
The reasons for this breakdown are structural rather than accidental:
Open-Market Order Book Illiquidity: The daily trading float on the NSE lacks the depth to absorb massive corporate buyback orders without pushing market prices past preset board price caps.
Anchor Shareholder Concentration: Over 60% of Centum’s equity is locked in tightly held anchor blocks—most notably institutional holdings and the estate of the late Chris Kirubi. These entities do not sell into daily order book liquidity.
Pricing Mismatches: Retail holders, acutely aware that Centum’s reported Net Asset Value (NAV) per share sits at KES 69.47 (FY26), routinely refuse to dump their stock at deep double-digit market discounts (~KES 18/share).
When an 18-month extension between October 2024 and March 2026 yields a paltry 150,800 shares (a 0.2% execution rate), repeating the exact same mechanism expecting a different result ceases to be a capital management strategy.
Debt Reduction vs. Share Price Engineering: The most glaring contradiction in this strategy lies within Centum’s capital structure and balance sheet liabilities. While the board has made commendable progress in clearing debt at the holding company level (PLC level debt stands fully repaid), heavy group-level liabilities remain across real estate subsidiaries (such as Two Rivers SEZ and development arms). Consolidated pre-tax losses were dragged down by KES 1.75 billion in combined losses and development financing costs at the subsidiary level. Allocating over KES 1.1 billion of liquid cash to buy back shares carrying a combined cash payout of KES 0.78 per share (KES 0.42 ordinary + KES 0.36 special) presents a stark math problem for financial analysts:
Dividend Yield Avoided (4.3%) » Weighted Average Cost of Subsidiary Debt / Opportunity Cost
Every shilling diverted to repurchasing illiquid shares on the bourse is a shilling not used to clear expensive subsidiary-level debt, de-risk real estate operations, or invest in high-yielding liquid securities. Clearing debt permanently de-risks the balance sheet, eliminates interest drag, and directly builds equity value for all remaining holders. Share price intervention on a low-liquidity bourse merely burns cash reserves for transient order-book support.
Mopping Out Retail: The Governance Paradox
If the market mechanics are flawed and the capital allocation math favors balance sheet clearing, why persist with a 10% buyback authority?
This brings us to the core governance issue: the gradual erosion of the retail investor base.
By continuously maintaining open-market bids for free-float shares, corporate buybacks systematically absorb equity held by smaller, fragmented retail shareholders who surrender to fatigue. Over successive cycles, this “mop-up” process accomplishes three key outcomes:
Concentration of Voting Control: Extinguishing retail shares concentrates ownership density further into controlling anchor blocks and insider estates.
Dilution of AGM Accountability: A shrinking retail float reduces the diversity of voting voices at AGMs, making it significantly easier for board resolutions, executive remuneration packages, and restructuring proposals to pass without pushback.
The Illiquidity Feedback Loop: Removing free-float shares from an already illiquid bourse reduces public trading volume even further, entrenching the steep discount between Centum’s market price and its underlying KES 69.47 NAV.
What Analysts and Retail Shareholders Should Demand
Centum does not have a share-count oversupply problem; it has an asset-monetization and market-trust problem.
Instead of ratifying another round of capital misallocation under the guise of an open-market buyback, shareholders and market analysts should demand clear strategic pivot points at the upcoming 59th AGM:
Direct Cash Deployment to Subsidiary De-risking: Channel free liquidity directly into extinguishing high-cost debt burdens at portfolio companies to stop consolidated earnings drag.
Focus on Portfolio Exits & Direct Dividends: Accelerate real estate asset liquidations and private equity exits to pass realized cash gains directly to shareholders via ordinary dividends, rather than through artificial share repurchases.
Protect the Free Float: Preserve retail participation on the NSE to maintain market diversity, trading liquidity, and vital corporate governance oversight.
Relying on open-market repurchases to fix a deep asset discount has failed once. Continuing down this path diverts precious liquidity away from strengthening the balance sheet while quietly diminishing the collective voice of the public retail shareholder.
About Boardlot Africa Research
Boardlot Africa is a premier financial intelligence and corporate governance publication dedicated to unpacking the mechanics of capital, market strategies, and structural shifts across East Africa’s corporate landscape. By bridging the gap between raw economic data and actionable market intelligence, we deliver deep-dive research, independent corporate analysis, and policy insights designed for institutional investors, boardrooms, and sharp market observers.
Get in Touch
Email: boardlot.research@gmail.com
Phone: +254 753 133 901
Substack: Subscribe to Boardlot Africa
X (Twitter): BoardLotSultan